Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement
by rsanheim on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:43PM
(#2875149)
In most cases you shouldn't have RVM in "production" any way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement
by metaskills on Friday August 12, 2011 @09:54AM
(#2877218)
To be fair, Wayne has always said that RVM was made for production first and development second. Not sure if it is fair to say it is not production ready since it has always been geared toward just that.
It doesn't matter what Wayne has always said. He's designed a collection of fragile shell script hacks that want to be run as root that fundamentally change the behavior of key system commands.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement
by regularfry on Friday August 12, 2011 @12:23PM
(#2877901)
Root? I don't think I've ever run RVM as root. Why does it need to? Not saying you're wrong, I just don't know what you're referring to.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement
by PatrickTulskie on Friday August 12, 2011 @11:57AM
(#2877775)
You don't have to run them as root. You can run them as a regular user. I'm pretty sure Wayne recommends against RVM system-wide and the preferred method is just installing it for individual users.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement
by SoreGums on Saturday August 13, 2011 @10:08AM
(#2880976)
login as regular user, download some version of ruby, compile for use as logged in user, install rvm, shazzam install any version of ruby you want - all of this only applies to the logged in user and has zero impact on the rest of the system. RVM rules :)
I no longer install ruby at a system level, not needed, only users running ruby stuff need ruby installed and never use distro ruby, creates all sorts of issues...