Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement

Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by xentronium on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:23PM (#2875086)

> I don't see a pressing need to use RVM in production

1. Gemset isolation comes in handy.

2. Sometimes you want to have multiple ruby versions (e.g. MRI for app and JRuby for memory heavy script)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by alrs on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:59PM (#2875195)

Debian allows you to install ruby MRI and jruby simultaneously.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by moe on Thursday August 11, 2011 @07:27PM (#2875290)

Recommending RVM for production use is hilarious.

Recommending debian-ruby for production use is bordering on physical injury.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by burke on Thursday August 11, 2011 @11:45PM (#2875900)

> Recommending RVM for production use is hilarious.

That's a pretty inflammatory, unsubstantiated opinion. Any reason?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by cdcarter on Friday August 12, 2011 @02:28AM (#2876209)

Likely the reason was "to make the joke work."

And also that RVM is a development tool, and the overhead it adds to production is silly.

[ Parent | on HN ]