Re:Things Go needs more than generics
by nemetroid on Monday October 04, 2021 @09:48AM
(#28746642)
> not really idiomatic.
Really? I haven't used Java in a long time, but in the languages where I've used Optional types, you'd always check for presence once and then extract the value before further use.
Really? I haven't used Java in a long time, but in the languages where I've used Optional types, you'd always check for presence once and then extract the value before further use.