Science doesn't tell you what to do, only what (probably) is as can be observed and deducted. I can believe in science without believing in your call to action. These past two years have been all about another natural disaster where two sides see the same statistic and come to different conclusions about what to do about it while accusing each other of being anti science

I really wish this phase could be banned. It's tiresome and in bad faith.

Is that really the problem here? Is that really what you should be focusing on?

Science is a method, it's not religion. You can't really "believe" in science. You can trust its methods though.

Which this person clearly is not doing. But thanks for making a pointless and pedantic distraction I guess?

What you are describing is religion, not science.

Oh yes, I am the problem here. Clearly. That is the logical conclusion to come to under these circumstances.

Seriously?