DNS Record Types

Re:DNS Record Types by pul on Friday October 01, 2021 @03:07AM (#28715528)

Ruurtjan from nslookup.io here. No one is really using the API it yet. Some competitors seem to be doing well, so I guess there's a demand. Maybe because it's simpler to integrate over HTTP than over DNS in terms of network config for enterprises? Not sure.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNS Record Types by donavanm on Friday October 01, 2021 @04:47AM (#28716086)

I haven’t looked at your API but a subtly critical aspect of diagnostics or introspection is being able to query from multiple client locations/resolvers. It’s really important to be able to disambiguate the “view” different clients have of the same labels.

Alternatively, if you’re targeted at direct client use, you may want to allow them to control the edns options, like client subnet, themselves.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNS Record Types by backoncemore on Saturday October 02, 2021 @10:08AM (#28728672)

> Some competitors seem to be doing well, so I guess there's a demand.

Sounds like a really thought out business plan.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNS Record Types by maltalex on Friday October 01, 2021 @03:35AM (#28715691)

I don’t see why it’s simpler, though there’s an argument to be made for HTTP being more familiar.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNS Record Types by oaiey on Friday October 01, 2021 @03:59AM (#28715824)

Well... are you / competitors just proxying or is there DoH elements sparkled in?

ps: lovely graphics

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNS Record Types by pul on Friday October 01, 2021 @04:44AM (#28716069)

It's just a glorified Dig wrapper ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]