Re:Attempts to scientifically “rationalize” policy may be da...
by evv555 on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @11:51PM
(#28702987)
Critical thinking is domain dependent. For example, just because you can kill it on white board interviews doesn't mean you will be able to navigate relationship issues. The way I imagine many PhD's I've talked to is like the RPG character where you max out one line of development at the expense of all the other lines. The counter-example would be the "T shaped" development profile which is the ideal imo.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Attempts to scientifically “rationalize” policy may be da...
by WalterBright on Thursday September 30, 2021 @04:54AM
(#28704369)
A research PhD should be able to instantly recognize logical fallacies outside their field, but in my experience they fall for them every time.
Re:Attempts to scientifically “rationalize” policy may be da...
by esja on Thursday September 30, 2021 @05:53AM
(#28704638)
Absolutely!
I often wonder whether the epistemology we are "born with" can actually be improved very much (in a general sense), or whether the best we can do is teach domain-specific techniques to override our defaults on those topics.