Re:Private censorship is not the best way to fight hate or d...
by BobbyJo on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @05:16PM
(#28700063)
It's no more subjective than 'less violence' provided the interested parties define measures for success. I mean, if the government can set goals for employment, then surely they can set them for civic engagement and disinformation.
Totally agree with your last two points.
Less violence, on the other hand, is a clearer goal that aligns with existing laws against violence, so it has a firmer basis, in line with existing restrictions on speech. It also gives you a non-partisan measuring stick.
Private platforms, on the other hand, will have more flexibility in trying to maintain, say, discussion quality as a goal (see HN's stated moderation goals vs Reddit's). Or disinformation, or language/profanity, or whatever else a private moderator may choose.
The government telling those private parties that they can't set their own standards, though, seems like a particularly terrible direction to go.