News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video]. Parent comment

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by dreyfan on Monday September 27, 2021 @07:55PM (#28677629)
Exactly where did I suggest using a single mysql instance or bandaiding a fleet of them together?

Clickhouse vastly outperforms and outscales Scylla with a fraction of the hardware and cost.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by PeterCorless on Tuesday September 28, 2021 @01:19PM (#28685154)
Different purposes — OLAP vs. OLTP. Reminder of this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22478407

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by VirusNewbie on Tuesday September 28, 2021 @01:32PM (#28685302)
Clickhouse is in no way an RDBMS.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by dreyfan on Tuesday September 28, 2021 @03:32PM (#28686505)
R doesn't stand for row-store. The access patterns of Clickhouse are comparable with any RDBMS. The fact that it happens to be a column-store doesn't make it not an RDBMS. It doesn't mean "row-oriented databases designed for OLTP workloads" as it appears you think is the case.

Should I have simply said "SQL databases where data is represented in tables with a defined schema" to simplify the discussion and prevent your ignorant diatribe?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by VirusNewbie on Tuesday September 28, 2021 @05:55PM (#28687990)
It stands for "relational", you know that CLickhouse is not a relational database right?

Have you used any of these technologies? Cassandra/Scylla have a defined schema. Did you really not know that?

[ Parent | on HN ]