Re:Goldman Sachs, Ozy Media and a $40M conference call gone ...
by pessimizer on Monday September 27, 2021 @04:13PM
(#28675444)
> Mediocre performers, but boy can they "look the part", flash a big gorgeous smile, and talk in ways that sound pleasing to leadership but are ultimately empty words.
Coincidentally, this also characterizes Ozy's content, which is unbelievably vapid and safe, but delivered with an unearned tone of gravitas. At least TED(x) talks were sometimes good because of the sheer number of them. Ozy content is never good.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Ozy Media and a $40M conference call gone ...
by chiefgeek on Monday September 27, 2021 @06:09PM
(#28676650)
Right! And go ahead and try to unsubscribe! Impossible.
Re:Goldman Sachs, Ozy Media and a $40M conference call gone ...
by soheil on Monday September 27, 2021 @07:15PM
(#28677295)
Obligatory question: why don’t you do that if it’s so easy? My suspicion is you judge a book by its cover, how do you know it’s not just how they treat others ie. with a big smile that makes them succeed, but also the effort they put in behind the scenes when you’re not looking?
Does putting up a great face necessarily mean the content must be garbage and the whole package cannot be just as great?
Re:Goldman Sachs, Ozy Media and a $40M conference call gone ...
by SuoDuanDao on Monday September 27, 2021 @08:01PM
(#28677663)
I don't think anyone is saying it's easy - the complaint seems to more be that it creates no value (unlike those hard working technologists).
And it's not just high profile entrepreneurs. Everyone knows people like this, they're all around us, climbing the corporate ladder. Mediocre performers, but boy can they "look the part", flash a big gorgeous smile, and talk in ways that sound pleasing to leadership but are ultimately empty words.