Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video]

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by doliveira on Monday September 27, 2021 @02:51PM (#28674511)

Not sure what you're talking about then? It seems you're just talking about the syntax used to query (which I agree SQL is a no-brainer) and not really about the "R" in "RDBMS"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by dreyfan on Monday September 27, 2021 @03:28PM (#28674987)

You haven't made a point yourself, so honestly, I don't fucking know what we're talking about either. You came in with a hyperbolic comment that echoes the stance from the NoSQL community I've seen for the past decade. The one that basically says "We have zero fucking clue how to model our data so we're just going to jam everything into bunch of loosely connected JSON documents and spend the next decade adding basic SQL features from the 70s".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by doliveira on Monday September 27, 2021 @03:47PM (#28675178)

I'm not a native speaker but I dare say the point itself about RDBMS was pretty clear. I don't really feel like continuing this argument either.

[ Parent | on HN ]