I'm a big believer that meritocracy and an ethics of self-motivation can genuinely help disadvantaged but talented people, but that requires offering them a place where they can dedicate themselves to developing that talent. I worry that talented but poor people would actually those that get hit the most by mixed solutions like that.
> I agree with this for like 95-99% of people.
Honestly, K-12 education is completely useless for the top 5% in the first place. You simply can't design a system around those people.
No doubt. Perhaps ironically, outliers that thrive on independent study (I likely would have been one of these people) drive inequality up!
in general i dislike the notion of 'unmotivated students' more often ime you have kids who not being provided an educational experience that aligns with their motivations.
But you can carve out a path for them.
Overall though, agree that it has been a total disaster apart from being a rare learning opportunity for policy makers.