San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns as public test nears

Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by sidibe on Monday September 27, 2021 @08:46AM (#28669997)

Uh neither of those even suggest what it does while Tesla's says it does something it doesn't do

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by onethought on Tuesday September 28, 2021 @06:04AM (#28681018)

So esoteric meaningless names are good.

Descriptive names are bad, because: I don’t think full self driving is full if there are any interventions.

(Despite there being a sliding scale of autonomous driving from levels 1 to 5 with FSD easily falling into 3 if not 4).

Teslas official literature classes it at level 2. But yep, super misleading compared to “Safe Sense” (aka forward hazard detection). Do you know what Tesla call that feature: “forward hazard detection” those bastards with their descriptive names!

[ Parent | on HN ]