Re:Fukushima studies show wildlife is doing nicely without h...
by bilbo0s on Sunday September 26, 2021 @10:19AM
(#28661078)
In fairness here, the comment said:
allowing THE REST of the planet to recover and thrive.
Which to me meant that humans are a part of the planet, and if you cut them out the other parts of the planet do "better" by the poster's definition of "better".
[dead]
Re:Fukushima studies show wildlife is doing nicely without h...
by true_religion on Sunday September 26, 2021 @10:17AM
(#28661071)
I don’t your argument here is very strong. By your original logic, allowing coronavirus to thrive will be beneficial for the planet by killing off humans, thus restoring the natural equilibrium.
I dunno, but if your first principle is “it’s okay for all humans everywhere to die since ______” then you will end up with some really odd inferences.
Are humans extra-terrestrial? How is humans thriving not part of the 'planet thriving'?