News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by a_square_peg on Sunday September 26, 2021 @06:43AM (#28659825)
I'm not referring to vaccine. Assuming you've been infected, if you have 98% change of surviving this disease, would you really be okay if you were forced to take a medication that has 1% chance of killing you?
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by lolc on Sunday September 26, 2021 @10:31AM (#28661165)
It wouldn't be framed that way. It would read: "Chance of recovery improves from 98 to 99 percent."

Chemotherapy regularily kills people. I would absolutely consider it. Taking a lot of pain to get a chance at extending my life.

Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by a_square_peg on Sunday September 26, 2021 @07:59PM (#28665729)
Chemo is a good example. It's used in a situation of last resort where probability of dying is already very high and if I were in that situation, I would too.
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by anchpop on Sunday September 26, 2021 @11:15AM (#28661500)
If my options are to be forced to have the medication or prevented from having it, I’d rather be forced to have it. It reduces my risk by half so why not?