News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns as public test nears. Parent comment

Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by d3nj4l on Sunday September 26, 2021 @06:02AM (#28659648)
Alright, let me just go to market with my “Cure For Cancer”. It doesn’t actually cure anything, but what’s that got to do with anything?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by FireBeyond on Sunday September 26, 2021 @03:30PM (#28663855)
You won't get to market. The Susan G Komen Foundation will sue you into oblivion, first. Apropos of anything else, they have trademarks on anything resembling "for the cure" when it comes to cancer.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_G._Komen_for_the_Cure#Co...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by ctdonath on Sunday September 26, 2021 @11:12AM (#28661471)
If it cures most instances of cancer, nobody will complain that the moniker isn’t totally correct in all cases.

If FSD can handle >90% of my driving, I’ll not quibble.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by kube-system on Sunday September 26, 2021 @03:14PM (#28663696)
By definition, the driver is in control of the vehicle 100% of the time when using a level 2 driver assistance system. These systems assist the driver with some of the steering wheel, accelerator, and brake functions, but ultimately, the human driver is always driving.
[ Parent | on HN ]