News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Developers fix multitude of vulnerabilities in Apache HTT... by bob1029 on Friday September 24, 2021 @02:50PM (#28646373)
Relying on obfuscation as part of your security posture is a fantastic idea IMO. Just be prepared for what happens if a human figures out your specific puzzle box.

We like exposing our private B2B web services in such a way that an attacker would be led to think the web server is totally fucked up or otherwise mis-configured if they don't understand the proprietary protocol. It's not that they could never understand it, but it would take a significant, targeted effort to even begin attacking our system in a direct fashion. Even if they figure out the obfuscation, they are still going to have to fight through a moat of PBKDF2 & hardware tokens.

To me, obfuscation is all about minimizing the impact of automated, mass, 0-day assaults. Some person will always be able to walk back something another person built. You can mitigate legions of scripts by cleverly dropping TCP connections when a resource isn't requested in just the right way.

Another fun option is to build a honey pot around your web service which has the ability to ferret naughty TCP pipes off to the hacker matrix where you then simulate all manner of PII-rich data sources for them to worry about (instead of your actual business).

Re:Developers fix multitude of vulnerabilities in Apache HTT... by aahortwwy on Friday September 24, 2021 @11:08PM (#28650123)
> To me, obfuscation is all about minimizing the impact of automated, mass, 0-day assaults.

It's the infosec equivalent of not needing to outrun the bear, just your friend.

Make your stack annoying enough to attack and attackers will move on to other targets.