Re:Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research
by BellLabradors on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:08PM
(#28645148)
The article has been previously submitted with and has languished without interest, I think that the Intercept's headline alone is underplaying it a little and is not suited to this forum. I think if you read the article, the HN headline above is accurate. What specifically do you think is inaccurate? Even in tone?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research
by WarOnPrivacy on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:21PM
(#28645316)
That's a reasonable question. First - my understanding is that we're expected to repost headlines verbatim, even if they kind of suck. It's not some unbreakable rule but it's an objective we should commit to.
Past that, I offer that headlines that will lead the public we have toward thoughtful, measured, conclusions (that reflect where we actually are) - this would seem to be our best goal.
Re:Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research
by BellLabradors on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:24PM
(#28645360)
Fair enough, it seems I can't edit it now, Dang obviously feel free to do so.