News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Olympic Medal Count, Adjusted for Population and GDP by brk on Monday August 25, 2008 @03:55PM (#286344)
You can, and at the risk of sounding even more negative, I don't follow "celebrity stats" much either.

However, I don't see people walking around with hats and jerseys with their favorite actors name on it the way you do for sports.

I do enjoy many mainstream forms of entertainment (TV, music, movies, etc) I just don't obsess over the smallest details of the entertainers, awards they have won, etc.

From my perspective, I would rather take credit for something I have personally done (alone or as part of a team).

Re:Olympic Medal Count, Adjusted for Population and GDP by aggieben on Monday August 25, 2008 @04:09PM (#286364)
However, I don't see people walking around with hats and jerseys with their favorite actors name on it the way you do for sports.

Yes. Yes you do. How many clothing lines exist solely because of some celebrity? Examples here: http://fashion.about.com/cs/celebritystyle/a/celebritylines.....

The difference is that the vapid celebrity culture is even more imitated than sports stars, but for even less apparent reasons. At least sports starts have accomplished something, even if it is ultimately not terribly meaningful.

Re:Olympic Medal Count, Adjusted for Population and GDP by brk on Monday August 25, 2008 @04:41PM (#286403)
I was going to mention the celebrity (endorsed) clothing lines, but most of those are less "obvious" (IMO) than the sports jerseys.
Re:Olympic Medal Count, Adjusted for Population and GDP by krschultz on Monday August 25, 2008 @06:03PM (#286495)
A lot of people that follow sports closely do it for the same reason that others do cross word puzzles and some are political pundits. Humans enjoy intellectual stimulation beyond their work.

If you think that watching SportsCenter everyday and debating sports with your friends is any different than us reading hacker news and enjoying debating about it, then you are just suffering a delusion of superiority. It has nothing to do taking credit for this or that, the debate is what interest people and the statistics are just the weapons.

Re:Olympic Medal Count, Adjusted for Population and GDP by brk on Monday August 25, 2008 @07:32PM (#286569)
See my other comment above, I think there is a difference because I can apply what I see and learn here directly to my daily activities and interests.
Re:Olympic Medal Count, Adjusted for Population and GDP by krschultz on Tuesday August 26, 2008 @11:47AM (#287185)
And people who follow sports deeply are also those likely to play and coach sports, they aren't applying it to their activities and interests? What?

Even a weekend warrior gains from watching watching their sport.