Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by jkhdigital on Thursday September 23, 2021 @02:25PM
(#28633089)
The reason it doesn't go well with politicians is because, in a massively complex modern economy, the "losers" in an unexpected default are nearly always a wide swath of average citizens and public institutions. Why? Because they are the ones who dump all their savings into "safe" mass market investments like blue chip stocks and corporate debt ETFs.
Re:What Does Evergrande Meltdown Mean for China?
by cinquemb on Thursday September 23, 2021 @09:59PM
(#28637844)
Yeah, I said "fuck it" when they started buying corp bonds… DeFi only now, and just finished getting an audit for a decentralized derivatives protocol that was seeded funded with a decentralized incubator.
We're planning on the protocol being able to lend liquidity into existence out of thin air (well more accurately, taking advantage of collateral dynamics and protocol stablecoin flows) and packaging that debt into decentralized stablecoins denominated in $…
Thanks to the moral hazards, they've have motivated me and others to pursue alternatives that in their eyes have systemic risk, and I'd agree, very risk to their bailoutistan system :D
If an asset depreciates or isn't worth what you paid for it, refusing to write down the asset and take your medicine sooner rather than later just drags out the pain. Better to take your medicine and get the pain over with so your economy can quickly reallocate and quickly bounce back. The losers must lose. This approach does not go down well with politicians, but is the best medicine for a sick patient.