In contrast, Bitcoin has a public global pseudonymous ledger. No warrants needed, a copy is freely available. Letting you trace flows of money from account to account instantly with no vendor issues and no judge to convince. Sounds powerful to me!
The article's phrasing is both correct and reasonable. And the reason to not explain every detail in a general-audience article is that most people don't care about the details. If they did, they wouldn't be reading general-audience material, but more specialized stuff.
With journalism we've seen the profession decline in expertise and standards over the past decades. Mostly because too many publications hire anyone who is willing to generate articles that generate clicks.
I am also not fond of click-driven headlines and articles. But this is not a new problem; when newspapers were mainly purchased individually, exciting headlines were used to drive sales. Now that companies get paid by the view, guess what! Organizations that prioritize revenue-generating views will survive.
If we don't like that, yelling at them won't help. And blaming random things like hiring policies especially won't help. We need to figure out how to get sufficient money into journalism in ways that rewards the kind of journalism we want. Personally, between Patreon and subscriptions, I spend a couple grand a year on that. What are you doing to solve the problem?
Powerful forms of financial tracking? God damn journos these days are fucking idiots.