Re:Lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data...
by jakeinspace on Wednesday September 22, 2021 @09:55PM
(#28624413)
Sure, but generally because the aggregated polls were systematically off. You may be thinking of other examples, but the 2016 US presidential election really wasn't that bad of a look for 538, they had Trump at reasonable odds going into election night. It's not like he was at 5%, 538 pegged him at 1/3 odds as polls opened if I remember correctly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.