News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data... by rajin444 on Wednesday September 22, 2021 @05:08PM (#28621839)
How many people were convinced of the "95+%" effectiveness of the vaccine only to learn that it fades? Why weren't they told it would fade up front?
Re:Lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data... by robbiep on Wednesday September 22, 2021 @05:30PM (#28622113)
Firstly, it wasn’t at all clear how quickly antibody levels would fall, because the data wasn’t available. But it was clear to everybody with scientific literacy that antibody levels would fall over time, because that’s how immune responses work.

What’s been fascinating about the data arising from Pfizer, moderne and astra Zeneca dosing intervals is that it seems quite likely that the spacing is quite to highly responsible for this rather than something inherent to the formulation which is adding to our body of evidence and understanding

Re:Lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data... by unreal37 on Thursday September 23, 2021 @12:23AM (#28625198)
I certainly knew last year, as we were watching the stage-1 stage-2 trial results come out, that "how long it lasts" was not known. The news was even saying, it may need to be renewed every few years.

And I'm not really a big follower of science. I just assumed it was like "the flu shot" which you need to get every year.