Re:A function decorator that rewrites the bytecode to enable...
by AndyKelley on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @03:07PM
(#28608606)
You have it precisely backwards.
These features already have reasons to exist, because they solve control flow scenarios. So there they are. And then we are brought the question of introducing goto, and there's just nothing that it adds. It would make the language more complicated for no reason.
These features already have reasons to exist, because they solve control flow scenarios. So there they are. And then we are brought the question of introducing goto, and there's just nothing that it adds. It would make the language more complicated for no reason.