An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: the origin of Covid-19

Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ... by jackfoxy on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @01:43PM (#28607554)

> I change my mind when facts/reality change. What do you do?

Exactly this.

Which is why I remain skeptical. My elderly father had a massive stroke 3 days after receiving the second shot, which was administered right after he recovered from covid, which he contracted after the first shot.

I'm also certain his care givers did not report this to the FDA's voluntary MedWatch database, which is the only way the government is tracking adverse events.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ... by mbrodersen on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @10:34PM (#28612543)

Do you know the difference between Causality and Correlation?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ... by jackfoxy on Wednesday September 22, 2021 @02:11PM (#28619704)

Edit: Yes. And I know the difference between evidence and proof and even the difference between skepticism and certainty.

I also recognize ad hominem arguments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ... by mbrodersen on Wednesday September 22, 2021 @09:46PM (#28624362)

So what evidence would you accept to prove you wrong? I have two injections and didn’t get a heart attack. Millions of people have two injections and didn’t die of heart attacks. If that doesn’t make you hesitate believing what you believe what would? If your answer is “nothing” then you are not being rational.

[ Parent | on HN ]