Re:Spy tech that followed kids home for remote learning
by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @06:47AM
(#28603714)
"You aren't renting a car. You are being provided a laptop, owned by someone else"
You are being provided a vehicle, owned by someone else. There is no difference, neither is an act of charity
You dont have to use a car, but your kid has to be at school, and has to use their laptop, so you don't have a choice to reject the 'terms and conditions'.
Is you kid's privacy worth less than $300 laptop?
"Please tell me specifically what law this violates, rather than hand-waving."
American Civil Liberties Union director Vic Walczak said that βthe school district's clandestine electronic eavesdropping violates constitutional privacy rights, intrudes on parents' right to raise their children and may even be criminal under state and federal wiretapping laws.β
You are being provided a vehicle, owned by someone else. There is no difference, neither is an act of charity
You dont have to use a car, but your kid has to be at school, and has to use their laptop, so you don't have a choice to reject the 'terms and conditions'.
Is you kid's privacy worth less than $300 laptop?
"Please tell me specifically what law this violates, rather than hand-waving."
American Civil Liberties Union director Vic Walczak said that βthe school district's clandestine electronic eavesdropping violates constitutional privacy rights, intrudes on parents' right to raise their children and may even be criminal under state and federal wiretapping laws.β
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_Scho...
https://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/is-your-school-spyin...
The amount of folks here willing to jump to defend the 'rights' of organisations at the expence of personal liberty is disturbing