Re:A function decorator that rewrites the bytecode to enable...
by ghayes on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @02:52AM
(#28602612)
For what it's worth, I actually think your code is clean as is, as it clearly shows the relationships of the computation, and it's easy to understand the flow of data. I'd just suggest naming the variables as best as possible, e.g. d16_NetIncomeRaw = min(...).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.