Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ...
by ipaddr on Monday September 20, 2021 @12:06AM
(#28590301)
What I have never understood is if you don't want the vaccine because the long term studies are due in 2023 what subset of this group is pro Ivermectin? Ivermectin used on humans is a new area with fewer studies.
Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ...
by Mountain_Skies on Monday September 20, 2021 @01:00AM
(#28590504)
No. Ivermectin use is humans is very well understood and has been for quite some time. What isn't well understood is what is the level of effectiveness of Ivermectin in preventing the spread of covid and treating the symptoms of the disease. It's an absolutely ridiculous statement to say Ivermectin in humans is not well studied. Whoever told you that had an agenda and you should be very skeptical of anything else they tell you. There is no equivalence in uncertainty between Ivermectin and the mRNA covid treatments.
Re:An appeal for an objective, open, transparent debate re: ...
by a_conservative on Monday September 20, 2021 @03:39PM
(#28597891)
Billions of doses of Ivermectin have been taken by humans.
In all fairness, my entire qualm with you is the way you've needlessly personalized this discussion. We could have discussed the issues at hand directly. Alas.