Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by Ajay-p on Friday September 17, 2021 @10:13AM
(#28565726)
I think for many there has always been an assumption of this. Saudi Arabia has funneled money in the past to terrorist organizations opposed to Israel and the West.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by whatshisface on Friday September 17, 2021 @10:55AM
(#28566173)
Does any country in the middle east have a good reason to care that much about Israel? Does Israel truly have a reason to care that much about any other country in the Middle East? As long as Netanyahu's expansionist desires are satisfied by shaving away pieces of his immediate neighbors, US invasion - which has happened to a few countries already - is a more real and present threat.
Of course, why SA would think that terrorism will keep the US out of the Middle East, that's the missing piece of this picture and may invalidate it.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by Leparamour on Friday September 17, 2021 @11:04AM
(#28566284)
> Does any country in the middle east have a good reason to care that much about Israel? Does Israel truly have a reason to care that much about any other country in the Middle East?
The answer to both of your questions is Iran. Which makes Israel and ISIS strange bedfellows, when Israeli fighter jets dropped bombs on Iranian-backed militas fighting ISIS in Syria.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by whatshisface on Friday September 17, 2021 @11:11AM
(#28566372)
Before Netanyahu can begin dubiously shaving off little slices of Iran, he'd have to dubiously shave off all of Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and northern Saudi Arabia. I have heard about the nukes thing but neither country would stand to gain anything even if the exchange was one-sided.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by rualca on Saturday September 18, 2021 @12:27AM
(#28573716)
> Edit: why does a call for transparency (...)
Perhaps because it does not read at all as a noble call for transparency and instead reads like cynical whataboutism that adds nothing to the discussion.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by whatshisface on Friday September 17, 2021 @10:40AM
(#28566004)
Talking about it so vaguely will just make all the current believers smugly say yes while everyone else smugly says no. I am perceiving a real piping hot morning mug of smug.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by post_break on Friday September 17, 2021 @10:48AM
(#28566089)
You mean the part where they took a piece of plastic and classified it as a machine gun, and told anyone who bought one to destroy it or go to prison? Meanwhile anyone with enough practice can bump fire a normal gun. All while not compensating a single person without threat of turning law abiding citizens into felons over night.
Re:Declassified FBI Report Reveals Saudi Ties to 9/11 Hijackers
by krapp on Friday September 17, 2021 @11:15AM
(#28566419)
Mass shootings are so common in the US (notwithstanding the anomalous ceasefire forced by COVID) that talking about them is like talking about the weather. Just another Tuesday blurs together with all of the other Tuesdays.
And why bother talking about them when "conversation" always follows the same tedious partisan flowchart?
Except that Israel despite being a logical target has mysteriously avoided terror attacks from Al-Qaeda or ISIS.
Of course, why SA would think that terrorism will keep the US out of the Middle East, that's the missing piece of this picture and may invalidate it.
The answer to both of your questions is Iran. Which makes Israel and ISIS strange bedfellows, when Israeli fighter jets dropped bombs on Iranian-backed militas fighting ISIS in Syria.
This is the current prime minister:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naftali_Bennett
Although the background isn't that much different from Netanyahu.
Can try thru https://12ft.io also
Perhaps because it does not read at all as a noble call for transparency and instead reads like cynical whataboutism that adds nothing to the discussion.
Probably the "how did all that shit get up there" problem is why the story vanished, relatively speaking.
And why bother talking about them when "conversation" always follows the same tedious partisan flowchart?