News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Video streaming battery life improved from 12h (12 Pro Ma... by bch on Thursday September 16, 2021 @05:07PM (#28557615)
Edit: my objection is incorrect. We’re in fact saying the same thing. I misread a previous post :/

Not if the broadcast is (eg) HLS[0], so I think the proper answer is: “it depends.”

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Live_Streaming?wprov=sfti...

Re:Video streaming battery life improved from 12h (12 Pro Ma... by bjustin on Thursday September 16, 2021 @05:26PM (#28557874)
I am surprised to see someone saying HLS wouldn't work this way. I'm not up to speed on the latest in HLS, but when I used it circa ten years ago, HLS worked by providing parts of a stream as individual video files, so I'd expect this is more true for HLS than a single-file-as-a-stream, not less. Videos were divided into fixed-length files, e.g. 10 seconds each. The playlist file saying what video files to use could list all of the file names up front for every provided quality level.
Re:Video streaming battery life improved from 12h (12 Pro Ma... by bch on Thursday September 16, 2021 @05:50PM (#28558155)
Indeed you’re right (and this was my understanding too) - I misread what a previous commenter was intending. I thought they were saying most broadcasts are 1-piece blobs, thus good for 5G bursting. My experience w HLS is indeed some small-number-of-seconds frames at a time. I guess I’m not sure here whether 5G is more battery-efficient or not. “Fast-enough” is all that’s required, so I guess it’s just the calculus of energy/bytes and how long the radio can sleep between segments. Seems very circumstantial to me…
Re:Video streaming battery life improved from 12h (12 Pro Ma... by 0x0 on Thursday September 16, 2021 @05:42PM (#28558054)
If you're watching a live stream, there won't be all that many seconds you can buffer.