Re:What's Wrong with Tech Hiring
by marcus_holmes on Thursday September 16, 2021 @10:25AM
(#28552226)
I've been working through HackerRank, LeetCode, etc - they have nothing to do with actual software development. And most of them rely on knowing some obscure algorithm or "trick" to solve, which you wouldn't do in real life - you'd Google the problem, possibly add a dependency, and be about your business.
But I've also been in technical interviews where the problem was used as a discussion point, rather than a challenge, and I get that use case - though "let's build a web server" might be a better problem to solve collaboratively.
Re:What's Wrong with Tech Hiring
by VirusNewbie on Thursday September 16, 2021 @04:27PM
(#28557091)
Interesting, I'd say 80% of the 'easy' level questions are very relevant to understanding data structures one encounters on a day to day basis (maps, trees, lists, arrays) and basic ability to manipulate those with loops or recursion. I think those are very good interview questions.
I'd also say 90% of medium and hard questions are exactly what you said, relying on a relatively obscure algorithm.
For example I as a full stack web dev, never write sorting, very rarely search / string or scheduling and so on. However I happen to like puzzles and coding challenges, so I do them fairly regularly on a Sunday. Do people want to select based on hobbies?
Actually tricky stuff (tricky as in I have to think more deeply and do actual design) I have to do includes for example:
- caching and synchronization
- concurrency/asynchronicity issues
- deep SQL queries
- schema (DB/API/UI) design
- tree/graph traversal
- refactoring and code design
- breaking down (deeply coupled or complex) features into sensible tasks
- (declarative) state machines
- asking the right questions about an unfamiliar domain and deriving the right abstractions and data structures
- error handling, invariants, correctness...
Those apparently rarely come up in the types of questions that for example leetcode et al suggest. It's typically "A&D with a twist".