What would a better researched view of history say?
I'm not trying to troll you or make you write an essay here - just trying to glean the main points of what you believe so I can see your point of view.
Are you familiar with the view that the "Turing Test" was first conceived by Turing as a challenge to discern the gender of a human hidden behind a screen?
In my comment I was trying to point to Turing's interests in the nature of gender and humanity. I find that expansive and prescient in the sense that "computing" to us moderns is more about NLP than calculating maths, and yet, it's all the same thing under the hood.
I'm not sure what you are saying? Could you clarify?
What is "secretarial style busywork"?
Is this article also "ill-researched"?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/history-human-...
What would a better researched view of history say?
I'm not trying to troll you or make you write an essay here - just trying to glean the main points of what you believe so I can see your point of view.
Are you familiar with the view that the "Turing Test" was first conceived by Turing as a challenge to discern the gender of a human hidden behind a screen?
In my comment I was trying to point to Turing's interests in the nature of gender and humanity. I find that expansive and prescient in the sense that "computing" to us moderns is more about NLP than calculating maths, and yet, it's all the same thing under the hood.