Re:Spectrum OS: a declarative, reproducible, compartmentaliz...
by iammisc on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @01:10AM
(#28535481)
Nix doesn't guarantee reproducible builds. That's why there's a whole signing framework
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Spectrum OS: a declarative, reproducible, compartmentaliz...
by sa1 on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @01:18AM
(#28535520)
There is no disagreement there. Reproducibility is definitely a goal though.
I don't really understand your line of argument.
Re:Spectrum OS: a declarative, reproducible, compartmentaliz...
by iammisc on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @01:38AM
(#28535631)
It's a goal but not a fundamental design requirement for nix packages. It seemed like you were implying that you had to make nix builds reproducible in order to get them working with nixpkgs, which wluld greatly complicate things.
Re:Spectrum OS: a declarative, reproducible, compartmentaliz...
by sa1 on Wednesday September 15, 2021 @02:03AM
(#28535764)
Yeah, if every language had their build systems in order, we wouldn't have needed nix as much, so definitely grateful for what nix does.
But some problems can only be elegantly solved a level below nix.