News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by mjg59 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @02:50PM (#28529183)
The vaccine either contains or triggers the production of a specific protein that is (fairly) stable across variants - so there's only one thing for the immune system to key off. The concern around natural immunity is that your immune system may respond to some aspect of the virus that isn't as stable, ie it ends up recognising part of the virus that's present in your current infection but may not be in a later infection.

In reality it seems that the immune system does tend to end up targeting the same protein that's in the vaccine, but may be targeting different portions of it (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34103407/ talks about this). My understanding is that current data suggests the naturally acquired immunity is about as robust as the vaccine acquired one, but this wasn't a given.

Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by PaulDavisThe1st on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @07:11PM (#28532764)
Thanks for the excellent reply. Sorry about the folks who are not equipped to understand it's relevance or contents.
[dead]
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by mjg59 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @05:39PM (#28531737)
I've got a PhD in genetics.
[dead]
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by mjg59 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @05:49PM (#28531873)
If you want to optimise for targeting a specific virus, then yes, narrowly targeting the most stable functional element of that virus is preferable to targeting other elements of that virus. If you want to optimise for having a broad response to related viruses, then a less narrowly targeted response is preferable.
[dead]
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by mjg59 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @06:27PM (#28532346)
I was explaining why there's potentially a difference between natural immunity and vaccine-mediated immunity, and why one of these may well be preferable if the goal is to generate maximum immunity to a widespread virus. But that's not the actual goal, and as a result policy decisions may differ. Is the risk associated with vaccinating people who have some degree of natural immunity justified by any improvement in immunity they gain as a result? I don't know! I have opinions on the matter, but I'm not qualified to make that determination.
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by myrrlyn on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @06:27PM (#28532350)
is this going well for you
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by unanswered on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @08:57PM (#28533746)
I didn't realize I was supposed to be playing for high score; I think I've dug into the truth a bit though.
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by detaro on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @05:46PM (#28531833)
stop embarrassing yourself.
Re:Why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US? by itaru on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @06:16PM (#28532219)
Congratulations!