Re:Facebook knows Instagram is toxic for teen girls, company...
by lmkg on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @12:02PM
(#28526788)
First, it's possible to do worse and be factually incorrect. This was, and still is, common.
Second, it's possible to objective demonstrate whether a factual statement is correct or not. But whether a statement is disingenuous or misleading cannot be proven with the same level of certainty (absent evidence of intent). So bad-faith actors can always guarantee that disputing that contention will end in an "agree to disagree" draw at worst.
Why? Why is this socially acceptable? Is this different from the past, or are we just more aware of it?