News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Confessions of a Ransomware Negotiator by imwillofficial on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @10:03AM (#28524976)
This is wildly incorrect. For criminal groups who intend on making money, that payment is needed on a certain subset of victims are they can’t stay in business.
Re:Confessions of a Ransomware Negotiator by infinityplus1 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @10:09AM (#28525069)
I am a shady company who wants to take down a competitor. I can hire a hacker who'll do the dirty job for me and then get paid in cold hard cash. Or a nation state actor can decide to attack an enemy country's infrastructure.
Re:Confessions of a Ransomware Negotiator by nkrisc on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @10:47AM (#28525662)
So? If their goal is destruction what does that have to do with ransomware? They can do that whether paying the ransom is legal or not.
Re:Confessions of a Ransomware Negotiator by infinityplus1 on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @11:08AM (#28525995)
Deception? It can confuse the target about the motives of the attack.
Re:Confessions of a Ransomware Negotiator by nkrisc on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @05:29PM (#28531607)
So they were going to destroy data anyway, so this isn’t what outlawing ransom payments is meant prevent because it can’t. It will prevent ransomware for profit if no one pays.