That said, assuming the paper is just wrong is simply bias.
If there is an identity associated with race, there is no reason to think it doesn’t impact biology. There is no reason to assume it’s genetic.
False. Diet and behavior affect biology amongst other things.
> Also there is a more than hundred year history of scientific research and no genetic (or other) grounding for race has been found.
We didn’t have machine learning or big data 100 years ago.
Yeah, so if a South-Asian orphan is adopted into a Swedish family, he magically ceases to be of whatever race were his parents and becomes white. That's... not how the concept of human race works.
And it’s entirely possible that if he was adopted at a young enough age, whatever this AI is detecting would read him as white too, assuming his habits and diet affected his development, as they might.
Indeed that would be consistent with your claim that there is nothing genetic about race.