News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I refuse to let Amazon define Rust by xpe on Monday September 13, 2021 @01:37PM (#28514292)
> I'm OK with Amazon taking over. Maybe they can make the language really successful and a proper replacement for C++. The current team failed at that.

What positive reasons can you offer that suggest Amazon will be a good steward for Rust's continued success?

You think Rust has failed? Wow. What are your expectations for a new language to 'overtake' a behemoth in terms of adoption? Can you share any examples that underlie your expectations?

I admit ignorance when it comes to Amazon's contributions to the open source community. This is not willful -- I just have not noticed much discussion or mention of them. (We all know about their contributions to computing infrastructure of course.)

There are no comments on this comment yet.