News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Web Intents by alanh on Friday August 05, 2011 @02:29PM (#2851124)
Yes. Please, please, please. There is no reason sharing actions, etc., should not be handled by the user agent.

(I would also like to see browsers more closely support e.g. the big JS libraries like jQuery (UI) et al by having a local copy you can opt in to using instead of having the user download them yet again, but that's a separate dream.)

Re:Web Intents by crabasa on Friday August 05, 2011 @04:41PM (#2851676)
"There is no reason sharing actions, etc., should not be handled by the user agent."

Wait, why stop there? Aren't there all kinds of actions that should be handled by the user-agent? There are N verbs that we could get excited about wiring up, across M potential service providers. Woo hoo!

Of course, once the enthusiasm for the shiny wears off, we don't really want to have to experience the web this way. Do we?

Re:Web Intents by ori_b on Friday August 05, 2011 @06:11PM (#2852005)
I sure do!
Re:Web Intents by StavrosK on Friday August 05, 2011 @03:03PM (#2851269)
The latter is just better caching and using the CDNs, it's not really so much about building them in the browser.