Re:Uber must employ its drivers, Dutch court rules
by riffraff on Monday September 13, 2021 @07:59AM
(#28510381)
because it ignores the reality of european society: it's not a libertarian utopia, it's a society where the states do dictate things.
More specifically, it's blind to the fact that the parent comment is about existing regulation which is being abused.
It's like arguing with someone saying "you can't drive at 100 km/h in a residential area" with "well I am a CAN person myself, and I don' think we should say CAN'T".
Re:Uber must employ its drivers, Dutch court rules
by devcpp on Monday September 13, 2021 @10:57AM
(#28512289)
Driving at 100km/h in a residential area harms others with a high probability. Can you say that of someone working the way they want to with transactions consented between two adults?
Re:Uber must employ its drivers, Dutch court rules
by riffraff on Tuesday September 14, 2021 @11:18AM
(#28526147)
that is not the point I was making, the point is that it's stating an opinion that a regulation is wrong versus an argument that the regulation is being infringed.
More specifically, it's blind to the fact that the parent comment is about existing regulation which is being abused.
It's like arguing with someone saying "you can't drive at 100 km/h in a residential area" with "well I am a CAN person myself, and I don' think we should say CAN'T".