Re:Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?
by zamadatix on Sunday September 12, 2021 @02:38PM
(#28503623)
At 1G constant acceleration (both speeding up and slowing down) you can make it on a short vacation to the Andromeda galaxy and back in a lifetime (or 5 million years from the perspective or Earth).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?
by eesmith on Sunday September 12, 2021 @04:49PM
(#28504777)
It looks like about 57 years.
Assuming constant acceleration to the 1/2-way point, flip, deceleration, and using http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/slowerlight3.ph... :
Time elapsed (in starship's frame of reference, "Proper time")
T = (c/a) * ArcCosh[a*d/(c^2) + 1] (given acceleration and distance)
year = 365.25*24*3600; c = 3E8; a=9.8; d=1.25*1_000_000*(c * year)
from math import acosh
T = (c/a) * acosh(a*d/(c*c) + 1)
print(T/year)
=> 14.3 years each quarter
=> 57 years round trip
The speed at flip would be 99.99999999993978% c - good thing intergalactic space is mostly empty.
Re:Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?
by wruza on Sunday September 12, 2021 @06:31PM
(#28505669)
Bad news CMB shifts into infrared, visible, uv, xray and then hard gamma.
Re:Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?
by eesmith on Monday September 13, 2021 @01:10AM
(#28508047)
Oh, what a shame. I was about to install some rockets on my RV and head off to Andromeda. Guess I don't need to put my newspaper subscription on hold now.
Re:Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?
by smegger001 on Monday September 13, 2021 @11:45AM
(#28512947)
since we are talking insane speeds and energies required to reach them why not just say you are in a bigger ship with more radiation shielding a dozen or so meters of water in the hull and a layer of lead a foot thick aught to stop most of it
Re:Why can’t I go faster than the speed of light?
by eesmith on Monday September 13, 2021 @03:19PM
(#28515560)
FWIW, the Project Rho page I linked to also gives the derivation of the relativistic rocket equation. When I plugged in numbers, assuming an exhaust velocity of the speed of light (ie. impossibly high), I get a mass fraction of about 2,000,000 to reach top speed. Then another 2,000,000 to slow down.
Assuming the fully loaded RV weighs 5 tons, this means at max velocity the rest of the ship weighs 10 megatons, which is 10M cubic meters of water, or a cube 200m on each side.
That sounds like plenty of material, right?
The same Project Rho page links to https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0610/0610030.pdf which calculates that at the relatively slow 0.995c "the penetration depth of protons of this energy will be ~40 m in water and ~10 m in titanium".
For 99.99999999993978% c, even 10M cubic meters isn't going to be enough.