Re:Court issues permanent injunction in Epic vs. Apple case
by tracker1 on Friday September 10, 2021 @03:21PM
(#28485929)
Similar opinion for XM... Would never sign up again without a generated card number that is only good for a single charge. I only wanted to cancel one radio of 3 I had at the time. By the third 40+m wait after mysteriously "disconnected" after they couldn't talk me out of it, I cancelled the whole thing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court issues permanent injunction in Epic vs. Apple case
by IX-103 on Friday September 10, 2021 @09:55PM
(#28488811)
Don't get me started on XM. Starting the second year after I bought a car they were calling me several times a week. It took a few years of "No" and blocking any number in my area code that isn't in my contacts (my phone number is not local) for it to stop.
Then I brought my car to the dealership to have some recall handled, and the calls have started again....
Re:Court issues permanent injunction in Epic vs. Apple case
by Mavvie on Saturday September 11, 2021 @01:36AM
(#28489654)
I wonder if you'd get put on a block list if you answer the call but play a train horn into the phone every time instead of talking
Re:Court issues permanent injunction in Epic vs. Apple case
by ben_w on Saturday September 11, 2021 @08:48AM
(#28491569)
That sounds like it would primarily impact the low-paid worker on the other end of the line rather than alter company policy.
Instead I suggest playing back a pre-recorded sales pitch for a relevant trade union: The workers won’t suffer from bleeding ears and the bosses might actually care.