Re:MIT-designed project achieves major advance toward fusion...
by onlyrealcuzzo on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @07:17PM
(#28464246)
Is it massive because it's 6 meters? Like - a 6 meter diamond would be "massive" - but a 6 meter boat isn't that impressive.
Or is it massive like the tokamak is a 6 meter engine to a 100 km collider? Like there's a ton of other stuff being built in a massive structure?
Re:MIT-designed project achieves major advance toward fusion...
by dodobirdlord on Thursday September 09, 2021 @12:48AM
(#28466325)
A 6 meter superconducting magnetic containment vessel is massive, as such things go. But ITER is also an entire facility built around the containment vessel.
Re:MIT-designed project achieves major advance toward fusion...
by lambdatronics on Thursday September 09, 2021 @11:19PM
(#28477438)
The magnets are so large they had to build a factory on-site to put them together. If you can make the magnets small enough to transport from a centralized factory, that's a huge win.
>It just doesn't strike me as obvious that reducing the major radius by a few meters would have such a huge impact on cost/timelines.
It would, easily. Past a certain size, production costs rise exponentially and require one-off tech.