News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wadler's critique of SICP (1987) by belial on Thursday August 04, 2011 @07:22AM (#2845465)
When I was in uni I got my introduction to programming in C. And it was the most funny and mind-opening course in my first year. So, I think it's subjective.

I agree that C++ is a complicated language, specially when you use Boost or Tools.h++, or the even make things worse. But when you teach beginners to code in C++ and only utilize STL, I believe it would be an interesting and challenging course. Plus, in an entry level course, you only need to introduce the basics of programming, which are (in an abstract sense) general logic principles and language agnostic.

Re:Wadler's critique of SICP (1987) by Peaker on Thursday August 04, 2011 @07:34AM (#2845503)
C is actually a relatively simple language and a good choice for beginners.

I agree that you need to teach general logic principles which are language agnostic, but if you do this in the context of C++, the beginner is bound to waste a lot of his time fighting irrelevancies in the language.

Re:Wadler's critique of SICP (1987) by belial on Thursday August 04, 2011 @08:03AM (#2845578)
I got your point. I agree with you actually.