Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate

Re:Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate by layoric on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @11:27PM (#28452681)

I strongly disagree. There is already informal voting (aka donkey vote), people who want to use their vote as a "screw you" have to choose between a number of candidates/parties, so who they are "screwing" is pretty hard to tell.

I actually think compulsory voting brings forward the importance of thinking about the consequences of voting, and voting for candidates that have the same values. Granted this can be manipulated (and is) with ads etc but getting people use to being involved I think is far better than making it optional and creating people that either never vote or a population that does when things are "bad" and an apathetic group when things are "good".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate by jsscclr on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @01:51AM (#28453529)

To clarify, donkey votes are perfectly valid. This is where the voter simply fills the boxes the same as they are displayed (first presented candidate gets number 1, second gets 2, etc.). A donkey vote is a formal vote, just one typically driven by the same factors that would drive an intentionally informal one. An example of an informal vote that I encountered during scrutineering a local council election is when one voter drew their own box, labelled it "Tony Abbott", and voted for that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate by layoric on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @02:37AM (#28453819)

Thanks for that, my mistake.

[ Parent | on HN ]