Re:Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
by animal_spirits on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @11:24PM
(#28452655)
Interesting. I found this:
>
ABSTRACT: When Alaska became a state in 1959, state laws removed control of
alcohol regulation from the federal government and Native communities. In 1981,
however, the state legislature changed alcohol laws to give residents broad powers to
regulate how alcohol comes into their communities via a local option referendum. By
mid-1999, 112 small communities had held 197 alcohol control elections under the state
law. Sixty-nine percent of these elections added new restrictions on alcohol, while 13%
removed restrictions previously imposed. The remaining 18% of elections did not receive
a majority vote needed to change the existing status. Most communities passing local
option restrictions chose to ban sale and importation. Although most of these elections
occurred during the first eight years after the law was passed, elections continue to
occur as the law evolves and as communities debate the merits of alcohol control.
Although growing evidence suggests that the local option law may reduce adverse
effects of alcohol abuse in Alaska Native communities, its most important contribution
may be to restore to these communities a limited form of self-government.
> ABSTRACT: When Alaska became a state in 1959, state laws removed control of alcohol regulation from the federal government and Native communities. In 1981, however, the state legislature changed alcohol laws to give residents broad powers to regulate how alcohol comes into their communities via a local option referendum. By mid-1999, 112 small communities had held 197 alcohol control elections under the state law. Sixty-nine percent of these elections added new restrictions on alcohol, while 13% removed restrictions previously imposed. The remaining 18% of elections did not receive a majority vote needed to change the existing status. Most communities passing local option restrictions chose to ban sale and importation. Although most of these elections occurred during the first eight years after the law was passed, elections continue to occur as the law evolves and as communities debate the merits of alcohol control. Although growing evidence suggests that the local option law may reduce adverse effects of alcohol abuse in Alaska Native communities, its most important contribution may be to restore to these communities a limited form of self-government.
[0] https://iseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/Alcoh...