It's like every DDG related HN thread always has these comments:
- I moved to DDG X years ago and it's [fine|better than Google]
- I can't find anything on Google anymore
- Here's a search where I didn't find what I want.
It's reached the point that I just immediately tune out whenever someone brings up anecdotes. There just seems to be so much confirmation bias.
I mean no disrespect here. This is generally true. Anecdotes just don't mean anything but for some people tech people love them when it comes to search.
For that matter, is there any more objective data about the quality of search results over time or are anecdotes all we currently have?
It would be an almost impossible task to filter these out because they are specifically generated to look exactly like the content you are looking for.
Many here would dispute this claim. However, it may be that SEO spam has caught up and we're merely at the old equilibrium rather than worse than before the peak of Google usefulness.