News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intermediate Algebra by Aicy on Monday September 06, 2021 @09:00PM (#28439726)
> Any given irrational number may not be possible to write down.

There's no "may" about it!

By definition an irrational number has an infinitely long decimal expantion that does not repeat, so none of them can be written down (other than in symbolic representations like pi)

Re:Intermediate Algebra by seoaeu on Monday September 06, 2021 @10:31PM (#28440222)
In fact, since there are only a countably infinite number of symbolic representations but an uncountable number of irrational numbers, nearly all of them cannot be written down at all!
Re:Intermediate Algebra by Koshkin on Monday September 06, 2021 @10:45PM (#28440326)
If you mean representations using finite sequences, sure. But the set of all infinite sequences (e.g., of digits) is uncountable.
Re:Intermediate Algebra by Aicy on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @05:55AM (#28442887)
That's the point. There is uncountably many infinite sequences, but we only have countably many symbolic representations, so we can't write most real numbers down even with infinite time.
Re:Intermediate Algebra by seoaeu on Monday September 06, 2021 @11:19PM (#28440564)
Representing a number as an infinite sequence of digits isn't helpful if you are trying to write down the number. You can't write an infinite number of digits after all
Re:Intermediate Algebra by Koshkin on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @07:53AM (#28443569)
But then your point is the identical to the parent’s.