> Seems reasonable to understand "no tracking or logging" to mean that in the event of a government demand to produce records, they could honestly reply that no records exist.

And they would. They don't keep those records. However, when a government agency shows up with a court order that states they have to cooperate and provide those records going forward they must comply.

> What's the point of bragging about "no tracking or logging" if you're just going to track and log like every other email provider if the government asks for it?

Again: a reasonable person would not assume that their email provider is a criminal enterprise that does not comply with the law.