Re:Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
by max_ on Monday September 06, 2021 @05:37AM
(#28431979)
> Why do these scientists assume the worst as a starting point?
You just described the Karl Popper criterion. [0]
It's the most rigorous way of doing science. The same also kind of exists in law with the innocent "till proven guilty"
You just described the Karl Popper criterion. [0] It's the most rigorous way of doing science. The same also kind of exists in law with the innocent "till proven guilty"
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability