But the case of Andreas Scheuer let's me doubt the effectiveness of such a thing: Everybody knows about the 500 million € he wasted, but since the party is just not affected by it in polls, it does not care and nothing happens.
To make use of it for further analysis, some meta-data and normalisation would be helpful, e.g. whether someone received media allegations about corruption versus someone was actually fined.
The result could be used by journalists to generate infographics, and to select and slice-and-dice data for better reporting. At the moment, reporting is mostly on single incidents; only occasionally, at the end of articles, related incidents are mentioned. Systemic issues (e.g. regular political corruption in a party) require more long-term data gathering, which journalists rarely take the time for, and such a data-set could be very useful background material for it.
*The C stands for Christianity, but it might just as well stand for Corruption. Would be a lot more accurate too.